Stupidest question ever

[Solysis]

Philosophers be like

Why tho

[FAdadadada]

A homeless, naked man on the streets can be a philosopher so long as he’s spitting straight facts.

[Rafaelgamerplay_raf]

why tho?

[FAdadadada]

@Madofado

@InjectuousPotato

Why is it necessary to nail down a coffin’s lid? Are we expecting what’s inside to try to break free?

No, but you don’t want it to break open, either.

Preservation and sanitation is the primary reason why.

Although, back then, some people believed in the superstition of corpses rising from their coffins.

Actually, there was a fear of being mistakenly identified as deceased and being buried alive. For this reason, bells are sometimes attached to a coffin, so that when it’s rung, others are notified if the person in the coffin is actually alive.

[FAdadadada]

Anyone can ponder knowledge, reality, and existence.

[FAdadadada]

Does anxiety count as cardio?

[Madofado]

Probably not, it’s not like it’s healthy.

[FAdadadada]

Why not?

It’d do wonders if I can call mom every week to help my heart.

[Juan (Mr. intelligent. 🧠)]

@Madofado

@InjectuousPotato

If someone owns a piece of land, how deep does their ownership go? Do they own it all the way to the center of the earth?

Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos, or “Your property extends upward to heaven and downard to hell”.

Is that Latin?

[Madofado]

I think so, yes.

[FAdadadada]

Oh, on that matter, and in regards to U.S. law, note United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946)
It was a United States Supreme Court decision relating to the ownership of airspace above private property.

@Wikipedia

The United States Government claimed a public right to fly over Causby’s farm, while Causby argued such low-altitude flights entitled the property owner to just compensation under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment."[2] The findings were two-fold. The court rejected the United States Government’s assertion to “possess” and “control” airspace down to ground level, and it nullified the doctrine that property extends indefinitely upward.

---

In regards to “ad enfernum,” which posits that property ownership extends “to the center of the Earth”:

@Wikipedia

A review of modern American jurisprudence demonstrates that the theory is more poetic hyperbole than binding law, and that broadly speaking, the deeper the disputed region, the less likely courts are to recognize that the surface owner holds subsurface title.[21] Appraisal studies of subsurface projects such as subways, deep storm drainage tunnels, and particle colliders consistently conclude that such projects, built well below the area that the vast majority of surface property owners ever put to use, do not deprive the surface owners of any value.[22]

---

In regards to to outer space, note the Outer Space Treaty (1967). According to this treaty, no nation may claim sovereignty of outer space or any celestial body.

[Juan (Mr. intelligent. 🧠)]

Ah I see, but answer me this, if a human is falling at 100 mph while being purple. And they are eating a telephone how tired are they?

[FAdadadada]

Who knows.

If a person shoots himself, how hot is the sun?

[Juan (Mr. intelligent. 🧠)]

Hm that’s a tricky one I’ll go with abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwzyz.

[FAdadadada]

This is a case of non sequitur (“it does not follow”).
This occurs when something is said that does not relate to what preceded it.

Example:
I like ice cream. God is dead.

[Juan (Mr. intelligent. 🧠)]

Yes that happens all the time, like a blueberry.

Carp.

Bigfoot.

[Madofado]

If Jacob goes on a train that goes at 60 miles an hour and his car would go 40, calculate the destruction ability of s m a r t c u r s o r

[Solysis]

Aly buys 8 oranges

He goes on a train heading 78KM ph.

Calculate the mass of the sun

[shadow3797]

i believe yes is the answer

[shadow3797]

why is this post so popular lmaoo