Even at “obvious” false bans like for saying 1.4.4.9?
Is this caps bypass that will get me banned?
Caps bypass using the allowed impersonation of fictional characters:
Survival > [Avenger] <Monitor> (<-- kick me) : oh no i died
Survival > [Gryffindor] <Glasia> (08/15) : [Wizard] <Harry Potter> (with Wings) : RIP
The text trying to go through is an acronym (RIP
) and not a full phrase.
I know doing this:
Survival > [Gryffindor] <Glasia> (08/15) : [Wizard] <Harry Potter> (with Wings) : MOONLORD SPAWNING IN SURVIVAL
is similar to
Survival > [Gryffindor] <Glasia> (08/15) : EYE OF CTHULHU SPAWNING IN SURVIVAL caps caps caps caps caps caps caps
a caps bypass because you try to get a whole phrase in caps through.
/buff
and /permabuff
have been disabled in Survival for done time now, so meh.
I don’t even think that’ll work as of now? Ever since around 1.4.3.2, a feature was added by Re - Logic where if a server forces any changes onto a client, then their character will not save any further changes from then on. /buff
(and by extension, /permabuff
) just add the buff to the character instead of giving it through natural sources like drinking a potion or getting hit by something that can inflict Feral Bite, which means that if you use /buff
for that and you leave, you won’t have Feral Bite saved on your character.
So would i be allowed to do this then go to items instead of my own world?
On mobile clients, you can do /buff then leave like normal, as the items will save.
I dont think that is appropriate. Just dont do that
well, what the contraption is doing isn’t really preposterous, anyone can hold down click. the rubberband would more or less be a minor convenience for people with sore hands and it wouldn’t be pulling off anything unfair
Does this break S5#2 - No exploits?:
One dies in survival then the respawn timer is 30s (or 60s if there is a boss fought) then they enter /(otherdimension) then /survival which is taking only 10 seconds.
I do believe there is anticheat to stop it and it says “you must wait x seconds before you can be alive.”
sorry please do not post here
Retitle that rule to Abuse of Permissions as that can also apply to
- supporters
- abusing relaxed antispam to spam the chat
- repeatedly joining and leaving to spam greet messages
- having a greet message that is just a bunch of random letters
- greet message contains inappropriate text (e. g. Otto has joined Otto greets: Glasia is a n…er)
- using the nickname function to rename themselves to impersonate other users
- crew
- abusing telekinesis in zombies
- abusing /tp in pvp
- spam summoning bosses and events in survival
- zombie map builders
- playing in mb lobby just for fun
- leaving a mb lobby full of players without map builder
- naming classes with inappropriate text such as the A, F, S, B or N word
- mods
- randomly banning and kicking users (e. g. ?ban Glasia “pwzovzsczsozbircaifcrwtsbofrsb”)
- joke kicks, bans and mutes (e. g. ?mute Glasia “you shall be banished to hell!”)
- Sending warnings but the text is normal text (e. g. ?warn Glasia “Hello, how are you?”)
I did not follow this rule and the previous one
make a new post in Ban Appeals
i made a new post and it was taken down for being a duplicate of a valid one
Continue doing that ban appeal
Macros are forbidden?
Yes, they are not allowed.
is there meant to be only one item in this list, or was it just forgotten?
i think there should be specification that its only banworthy if you KNOW that the items were hacked in. so like if someone gives me 1 hacked platinum coin, but i didnt know it was hacked, then it should be ok. the rule is written as if taking any items is bad whether you know it or not
the “Why is ‘x’ banned?” section seems to be outdated, so christmas hook just stands as an example case for this FAQ-esque question
you would need to divide the section for PvP, PvE, Survival, and maybe even Zombies to distinctly establish when and where which items are banned
i second this, an informal warn and a proper warn from a moderator proceeding that if the violator does not dispose of the items would get the message across while still giving the violator the benefit of the doubt
yeah i agree with it
seems like something that map builders have to worry about, and not players